TC Energy to develop ‘revenue framework’ for Ontario pumped storage project

The proposed plant would provide 1GW of flexible power by pumping water from Ontario’s Georgian Bay to a reservoir when electricity demand is low, and releasing the water back, turning turbines to generate electricity, when demand is high.

Ontario’s Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO) expects the province to need an additional 15GW of new power capacity by 2035, and TC Energy is optimistic that this project will help meet this demand with flexible power generation.

However, while the company planned to begin construction this year, it has still not received approval from the state government. Last week, Smith wrote, in an open letter to IESO president and CEO Lesley Gallinger, that he was “not prepared to make a final determination at this time” on either the TC Energy project, or a separate proposed storage project belonging to Ontario Power Generation and Northland Power.

Smith wrote that neither storage project would be a viable investment, compared to other energy projects such as battery storage, and would not provide net benefits to Ontario’s energy grid or ratepayers. However, he noted that the addition of new pumped hydro capacity could be of benefit to “enhancing the diversity of Ontario’s supply mix”, and that he would need to consider “a valuation of other broader societal and economic benefits” associated with these projects before granting approval.

As a result, TC Energy plans to submit a report, including a new revenue framework, for the project by the end of July 2024, and expects to receive approval from the Ontario government within 45 days, opening the door for the company to begin construction work in the latter part of this decade with commercial operation in the 2030s.

“The Minister’s direction to advance this project is a strong signal that the work TC Energy and Saugeen Ojibway Nation are doing is important,” said Annesley Wallace, executive vice-president of strategy and corporate development, and president of power and energy solutions, at TC Energy. “It recognises the critical role that pumped hydro storage will have in enhancing the diversity of Ontario’s supply mix and achieving a net-zero electricity grid.”

The news follows Boralex, EDF and Atura Power all seeking local support for large-scale battery energy storage (BESS) projects in Ontario, as interest in storage in the Canadian province grows.

Continue reading

Europe backs Northvolt with US$5 billion loan package

The package has been provided by 23 commercial banks as well as the European Union’s European Investment Bank (EIB) and the Nordic Investment Bank (NIB), an international finance institution founded by the five Nordic countries.

Northvolt said a “significant portion” of the package is covered by a number guarantees combined with direct funding, provided by the Swedish National Debt Office, Euler Hermes, the Export-Import Bank of Korea (KEXIM), Nippon Export and Investment Insurance (NEXI) and the Korea Trade Insurance Corporation (K-Sure).

The financing comes at a time when Europe’s nascent lithium-ion cell and material manufacturing sector looks increasingly under threat from the US market, after the introduction of generous tax credit incentives for clean energy manufacturing in the US. Under the 45X tax credit, US-based battery manufacturers are directly paid US$35/kWh of batteries produced, reducing the cost of producing batteries by about a third.

For example, Northvolt’s Norwegian peer Freyr has paused all further investment and development of its battery production facilities in Norway and Europe to focus entirely on the US, citing the tax credit incentives there. Tesla shelved plans to build battery cells at its gigafactory in Germany while other gigafactory companies elsewhere on the continent, like the UK’s Britishvolt, have collapsed.

In an interview with Energy-Storage.news to discuss its decision (Premium access), Freyr CEO Birger Steen said the company was seeking a package from the Norwegian government comprising export guarantees, loans and buybacks worth US$870 million (NOK9.5 billion) to resume European investments.

Commenting on Northvolt’s package, Northvolt CEO Peter Carlsson said: “This financing is a milestone for the European energy transition. It will enable us to realise the full potential of Northvolt Ett and demonstrates that circular, sustainable business practices are fundamental to success in today’s industry.”

Northvolt has secured offtake agreements with companies primarily from the electric vehicle (EV) market, which it says amount to US$55 billion of orders, and has also produced battery energy storage system (BESS) products from a factory in Poland (Northvolt Dwa) since last year.

In an interview at the Energy Storage Summit Central & Eastern Europe in September last year (Premium access), executives from the company told Energy-Storage.news that a ‘level playing field’ was needed in order for Europe to successfully compete with other markets on lithium-ion production.

Northvolt is also developing sodium-ion batteries in partnership with technology firm Altris, with the pair claiming a breakthrough in the chemistry’s energy density at the end of 2023.

The new package brings the company’s total equity and debt raised to-date to US$13 billion. Alongside its facilities in Sweden and Poland, the firm is also aiming to build production facilities in Germany (Northvolt Drei), the US (Northvolt Cuberg) and Canada (Northvolt Six).

Energy-Storage.news’ publisher Solar Media will host the 9th annual Energy Storage Summit EU in London, 20-21 February 2024. This year it is moving to a larger venue, bringing together Europe’s leading investors, policymakers, developers, utilities, energy buyers and service providers all in one place. Visit the official site for more info.

Continue reading

Australia needs renewables, transmission and lots of storage to quit fossil fuels

The clean energy transition is critical to meeting Australia’s climate targets, securing our energy future and ‘keeping the lights on’, as well as controlling and abating cost of living pressures experienced by Australian households and businesses.

Australia has set goals to be net zero by 2050 (requiring a 43% reduction in carbon emissions), and 82% renewable electricity generation by 2030. However, right now, Australia is behind in this task to deliver a low-emission power system.

The transmission build that will be required to fully connect the new large-scale decentralised generation, rather than centralised fossil fuel power stations, is the equivalent of 25% of today’s entire grid. It will now need to be built in less than seven years.

Although key transmission projects have been identified, across the country we are a long way behind on their development. No new interconnectors have been built in Australia for over 20 years and the five regulated Primary Transmission Network Service Providers (PTNSPs) have yet to demonstrate they have sufficient capabilities or scale to mobilise the resources necessary for Australia’s transmission build out.

Lack of engagement with communities in the early-stage processes of major projects has evoked severe resistance which has become a bottleneck to new renewable generation capacity.

The issues facing our energy transition are exacerbated by the global race to decarbonisation. New programmes in the United States of America, European Union, and Asia are accelerating the clean energy transition by providing clear financial incentives (e.g. the Inflation Reduction Act, USA; the Green Deal Industrial Plan, EU). Australia will need to move quickly to ensure it can attract funding, materials, and skilled people.

The 2022 “climate election” saw a change in Federal Government and the election of several climate-focused independent candidates. The notable increase in pace and ambition of the political leaders in this sphere over the past 18 months means that Australians are beginning to understand that the shift to a clean energy economy is in our national interest.

Since taking office in May 2022, the Australian Government has established new and improved 2030 emissions reduction targets (43%, up from 26-28%), renewable energy targets (82%) and stronger industrial decarbonisation policies.

Figure 1: Required renewable generation (dark blue) in the NEM as recommended in the 2022 ISP Step Change scenario versus projected future delivery of renewable generation (pink) based on past delivery rates (grey) showing the significant and escalating shortfall in delivering renewable generation required. Credit: Nexa Advisory

32GW Capacity Investment Scheme

In November 2023, Minister for Climate Change and Energy, Chris Bowen MP, announced a historic new plan to drive investment in renewable energy generation and storage.

A significantly expanded Capacity Investment Scheme (CIS) will now act as the central enabler of Australia’s 2030 renewable energy target. Its key feature is that the federal government commits to under-write up to 32GW of renewables and storage this decade to drive record levels of private investment in solar, wind and batteries. For context, Australia’s National Electricity Market (NEM) currently has an installed capacity of 64GW, of which approximately 24GW is renewables.

It is expected that the CIS will go a long way towards Australia meeting our 2030 climate targets but, just as importantly, the scheme keeps energy prices down because renewables are Australia’s cheapest source of energy and it will help ensure replacement generation is available as the national fleet of unreliable coal-fired power stations shuts down.

At the energy consumer level, Australians remain prolific adopters of rooftop solar, and, reflecting the more ambitious approach taken by political leaders, we are increasingly aware that harnessing the nation’s unique access to mineral resources and renewables-friendly weather conditions can benefit our families, towns and the nation as a whole.

However, despite these encouraging indicators of progress, we have a long way to go to meet climate targets and make the most of our natural advantages. AEMO forecasts the energy system will need a total of 44GW of variable renewable energy (+28GW), 15GW of storage (+13GW) and 10,000km of new transmission lines before 2030 just to keep the lights on. This is largely to replace coal-fired power stations as they are retired over the next seven to ten years.

Meeting this challenge will be critical to maintaining the confidence in and the buy-in for the transition, both at a political level and, more importantly, for businesses and families.

Energy storage: Opportunities at every scale

Storage capacity at all scales will be required to ensure a reliable energy system. This includes the storage available on the distribution network as well as in homes, such as community batteries and virtual power plants (VPPs), and demand-side management. 

AEMO Integrated System Plan – Expected Energy Transition to 2050 (Storage). Credit: AEMO’s 2022 ISP

The 2022 Integrated System Plan sets out the scale of the storage challenge: today, Australia has a little less than 2GW of storage connected to the energy system. By 2030, we need a total of 15GW of storage, and by 2050 we need 61GW. Even with a supercharged Capacity Investment Scheme (which aims to secure 9GW of dispatchable capacity this decade) and the rapid rate that batteries can be deployed, that’s a big ask.

Small-scale storage in households can play a critical role in stabilising the enormous amount of energy being created on Australian rooftops.

Increasingly, rooftop solar and batteries are being paired together in new installations (nearly 50% of new rooftop solar PV installs are accompanied by a battery, according to the Australian Energy Council). This is encouraging. However, while this uplift has made storage more affordable, residential batteries remain out of reach for most households due to cost — likely to remain the case for the foreseeable future without government intervention.

Utility-scale storage is critical to a successful transition

Utility-scale storage will be needed to “firm” Australia’s clean energy grid to stabilise a bigger and more complex energy network — which is already one of the biggest machines in the world — and ensure the lights stay on.

South Australia is the home of the world’s first “big battery,” the Hornsdale Big Battery. Since that was connected, large-scale batteries in Australia have been deployed faster than was expected.

Batteries provide a number of benefits to the system and overall transition, which are sometimes underestimated or not understood.

Utility-scale storage:

Provides “frequency” support which helps to stabilise the grid in real time

Supports the power system’s integrity and the network in case of exceptional events.

Allows “arbitrage” when intraday prices are volatile — with the increase in variable renewable generation in the system and the exit of coal, this will be a significant commercial incentive in Australia.

Provides inertia services as coal power plants phase out, to solve a network issue in the system.

Smooths the intermittency of renewables—firming is critical to a 100% renewable energy system.

What is needed

Australia’s economy remains dominated by fossil fuels, and our national emissions continue to rise. Clearly, there is plenty of work to be done to add more speed and ambition to Australia’s energy transition.

To roll-out transmission infrastructure at speed, we need to open up regulated monopoly markets to competition and investment (as the Victorian government has done) and we need to design the planning approvals process in line with energy generation capacity requirements identified by energy market operators.

The pilot phase of the Capacity Investment Scheme, announced by state and federal governments in December 2022, has seen Australia build more utility-scale storage (“big batteries”) built than ever before. But to meet the “gap” in dispatchable energy caused by forecast coal-fired power station closures, governments will need to ensure the next stage of the CIS delivers on its promise of 32GW of new variable renewable energy and storage by 2030. That could drive the need to legislate the scheme to ensure pollical endurance and investor certainty.

To drive decarbonisation at the household level, governments should look to expand the Small-scale Renewable Energy Scheme to include household batteries and legislate a national mechanism to provide investment. It also means prioritising tariff reform to ensure people are incentivised to build trust and allow for innovation in service delivery.

Australia already has smart solutions to meet new and improved energy targets. The science and economic cases have been made, and political will is beginning to align with 2030 climate targets. What’s left is finding the money, the ambition and the leadership to realise our potential and become a world-leading renewables-powered clean economy.

This is an extract of a feature article that originally appeared in Vol.37 of PV Tech Power, Solar Media’s quarterly journal covering the solar and storage industries. Every edition includes ‘Storage & Smart Power’, a dedicated section contributed by the Energy-Storage.news team, and full access to upcoming issues as well as the nine-year back catalogue are included as part of a subscription to Energy-Storage.news Premium.

About the Author

Stephanie Bashir has over two decades of experience in the Australian energy sector with extensive experience in commercial, regulation, energy policy, government and stakeholder engagement. She is the founder and CEO of Nexa Advisory advising a broad range public and private clients including renewable energy developers, investors and climate impact philanthropists to help accelerate efforts towards a clean energy transition.

Energy-Storage.news’ publisher Solar Media will host the 1st Energy Storage Summit Australia, on 21-22 May 2024 in Sydney, NSW. Featuring a packed programme of panels, presentations and fireside chats from industry leaders focusing on accelerating the market for energy storage across the country. For more information, go to the website.

Continue reading

Giga Storage to start building 2,400MWh BESS in Belgium in 2024

In the announcement, Joeri Siborgs, general manager GIGA Storage Belgium, said: “This project is being developed on an industrial site where there was a previous initiative to develop a battery. The permit application has been submitted, and we expect to commence construction in 2024. GIGA Storage aims to achieve the realisation of 3GW of battery storage in Belgium by 2030.”

The project is among the largest being developed in Europe that Energy-Storage.news is aware of and would go a long way to helping Elia integrate more intermittent renewable generation onto the grid in Belgium.

The location appears very similar to a previously announced 300MW/1,200MWh project from Giga Storage, however a spokesperson told Energy-Storage.news they are different projects.

Belgium has regularly been praised for its facilitation of the grid-scale energy storage market – including handing out capacity market contracts to large-scale BESS – while major challenges to getting the Netherlands’ one off the ground have also been cited numerous times.

Dutch utility Eneco is set to commission a 200MWh BESS in Belgium, it announced last year whilst calling for more to be done by its own government, while France-based utility Engie is looking to deploy large-scale projects totalling 380MW in Belgium.

The largest project in progress in the Netherlands that we are aware of is a 250MW/1,000MWh BESS but, as reported by Energy-Storage.news, the local municipality is having to amend its local zoning regulations to help it progress.

Concurrent to Giga’s announcement of its project in Belgium, another developer S4 Energy announced a deal with Telsa for 12 Megapacks for a 11MW/44MWh project in the Netherlands. The project will be a hybrid installation combining batteries and a flywheel.

Energy-Storage.news’ publisher Solar Media will host the 9th annual Energy Storage Summit EU in London, 20-21 February 2024. This year it is moving to a larger venue, bringing together Europe’s leading investors, policymakers, developers, utilities, energy buyers and service providers all in one place. Visit the official site for more info.

Continue reading

European Union countries’ clean energy plans ‘fall short when it comes to energy storage’

However, while at a high level, this requirement has been alluded to by many EU countries, when it comes to the NECPs assessing the different needs of individual states and determining how energy transition schemes will be implemented, what are often “simple steps” to promote storage are being overlooked.

A new analysis of draft NECP submissions from the 27 Member States examines how energy storage is treated in the plans across three key areas identified by the coalition: assessment of price flexibility in energy markets, publication of a comprehensive strategy on energy storage and the removal of double charging of grid fees for transmission-connected storage assets.   

None of the NECP drafts have been categorised as “on the right path” in all three metrics. Only Spain and Portugal have earned commendations in two out of the three, with the majority only winning the trade organisation’s approval for one at most.

Analysis infographic of the different NECPs. Image: Energy Stoage Coalition.

The blank white circles above denote that relevant texts were yet to be published at the time of the Energy Storage Coalition’s analysis at the beginning of this year. The coalition was formed by solar PV trade group SolarPower Europe, the European Association for Storage of Energy (EASE), wind energy group WindEurope, together with sustainable energy venture capital (VC) investor Breakthrough Energy.

Spain’s NECP is one of the “most complete” drafts, including a reinforced commitment to procuring flexibility for the grid and a comprehensive energy storage strategy. Since 2021, the country has had in place a storage deployment target of 20GW by 2030, and then 30GW by 2050 as part of its storage strategy.

Metrics: Double charging, flexibility assessments and storage strategy  

Double charging of fees for grid use has long been highlighted as a major barrier to the investment case for energy storage across Europe.

In short, energy storage facilities are treated as both generation and supply to the grid in most regulatory regimes, and charges are levied at the point of both withdrawing (charging) and depositing energy (discharging).

Putting an end to double charging, which largely only exists because regulations were written before grid-connected storage capacities were expected to be deployed at scale, would be a powerful supply side driver for storage.

This is perhaps the area where the most action has been taken, with five among the Member States considered to have taken action on double charging: Czechia, Germany, Portugal, Spain and Sweden.

Meanwhile, with energy storage as a key resource to add flexibility in the balancing of supply and demand for electricity, national assessments of flexibility requirements on the grid network would help determine the volumes of energy storage needed and the sort of applications it could provide.

Only four Member States have carried out a precise flexibility assessment: Hungary, Italy, Luxembourg and Portugal.  

An energy storage strategy is perhaps the most readily self-explanatory of the three metrics. Just three countries: Spain, Greece and Malta, have one of these.  

Unsurprisingly, the Energy Storage Coalition called for action to be taken in all three areas, as well as calling for support schemes and regulatory treatment of storage to be technology agnostic.

NECPs were first implemented in 2019. Last year the European Commission called on Member States to make updates to them, ahead of this June when approved plans are signed into law.

As reported by our colleagues at PV Tech in mid-December, the EC’s own analysis of draft NECPs found that even the revised plans would fail to meet the 42.5% Renewable Energy Directive (RED) target by 2030 and fall far short of the 45% “ideal scenario” target.

Energy-Storage.news’ publisher Solar Media will host the 9th annual Energy Storage Summit EU in London, 20-21 February 2024. This year it is moving to a larger venue, bringing together Europe’s leading investors, policymakers, developers, utilities, energy buyers and service providers all in one place. Visit the official site for more info.

Continue reading

Energy management systems (EMS) and the growing trend of EMS retrofits

There is a trend in the industry to upgrade or retrofit the EMS because of economic and operational issues. Retrofitting the EMS is a big decision, and it is important to plan out the retrofit sequence properly. About 20% of Fractal EMS’ deal flow is retrofits.

BMS vs EMS: What is the Difference?

The battery management system (BMS) is often confused with the EMS. The BMS is a simple system that does two things: 1) place the batteries online/offline 2) keep the batteries safe. When starting a BESS, the EMS will request that the BMS place the batteries online (establish the DC bus). If the BMS senses it is safe, then it will carry out the command. While operating, if the BMS senses parameters that are out of range, then it will request that the EMS reduce power (if parameters are violating fault thresholds, then the BMS will open rack contactors).

Compared to solar SCADA (supervisory control and data acquisition), BESS EMS is significantly more difficult. Some owners have found this out the hard way. The EMS has an outsized responsibility compared to its cost. For projects larger than 100 MWh, the following are two cost metrics:

CAPEX: the EMS should cost less than 1% of project CAPEX for the following scope: 

Control equipment and control code 

RTACs and programming 

Cybersecurity equipment and configuration 

Networking equipment and setup 

HMI/historian server and software (including reports) 

OPEX: the EMS annual software license should cost less than 1% of annual revenue (revenue optimisation should also cost less than 1% of revenue) 

Reasons for Retrofits 

The EMS is underperforming or not working: 

Stratified SOCs across battery containers

Inability to read and/or diagnose equipment fault codes

Inability to remotely clear equipment fault codes

Inability to overcome OEM local controller issues (if applicable)

Inability to compensate for BMS deficiencies (P-limiting, SOC thresholds, fire alarm issues, etc.)

The integrator has maxed out their liquidated damages (and have probably reduced support) 

Inability to meet ancillary qualification requirements e.g., Fast Frequency Response 

Poor DC coupled PV + storage performance 

Cybersecurity concerns 

Failure to meet recommendations of NERC CIP, NIST 800 and ISO 27001 

Need for on-site controls and servers (i.e., no cloud commands) 

CIFIUS requirements (especially if computer boards and code are foreign) 

Cyber risk due to a foreign BMS  

EMS is outsourcing or off-shoring software development

Lackluster HMI/UI experience, historian, analytics or reporting 

Lack of fire system integration (some EMS provide similar functionality to a FACP) 

BESS EMS does not properly integrate with the owner SCADA or EMS 

Poor customer service or outsourced technical support to foreign country 

Universal fleet control: as the owner accumulates multiple projects, they realise a universal EMS system is preferred 

The EMS company is insolvent or no longer supports the EMS 

The EMS is expensive relative to its features 

Process and Timeline to Retrofit an EMS

The following is a high-level summary of the steps and timeline to perform a retrofit. 

Research the existing project (1-2 weeks): 

Equipment and network topography 

Project documentation  

Deep dive existing issues 

Project scope and desired control modes

Provide a 60% drawing set of the new EMS (2-3 weeks) 

EMS equipment procurement and shipment (4-12 weeks) 

Removal of old EMS equipment (1-2 days) 

Installation of Fractal EMS equipment (2-3 days) 

Fractal EMS integration, development, and testing (4 weeks) 

Commissioning and Substantial Completion (2 weeks)* 

*If the project has multiple inverters then step 6 only needs one inverter and its batteries. This means the rest of the project can keep operating (partial outage) and the project only needs a full outage of two weeks to perform step 7.

The decision to retrofit the EMS often comes down to the following themes: 

The EMS subscription is expensive (more than 1% of annual revenue). 

The EMS is causing downtime (EMS availability of less than 99% is detrimental). 

The EMS has cybersecurity concerns or is not addressing foreign equipment risks (e.g., cyber attack through the BMS). 

The EMS allows the owner to consolidate software for their operations team while keeping the ability to choose different equipment project to project. 

Feel free to reach out if you have questions about retrofitting: daniel@fractalems.com.

Continue reading

Developer Exagen gets approval for 1GWh UK BESS

Exagen submitted plans for the battery asset in January 2023, as reported by Solar Power Portal, and confirmed that the project would be capable of providing enough power for 80% of the homes in the county. £270 million in financing is set to be allocated to the project and will connect directly into a new substation owned by National Grid.

Although the energisation date has not been finalised, Exagen plans to commission the project in 2029, and operate the project for 40 years.

See the full version of this article on Solar Power Portal.

Energy-Storage.news’ publisher Solar Media will host the 9th annual Energy Storage Summit EU in London, 20-21 February 2024. This year it is moving to a larger venue, bringing together Europe’s leading investors, policymakers, developers, utilities, energy buyers and service providers all in one place. Visit the official site for more info.

Continue reading

Japan’s low-carbon capacity auctions ‘will have significant impact’ on business case for batteries

Japan-based energy market consultancy Shulman Advisory wrote on its corporate blog last week (12 January) that power generators will bid using specific bidding units per kilowatt per year to contract with retail electricity providers to sell them power over 20-year terms from new-build capacity.

This, Shulman Advisory said, would give successful generators “a stable long-term fixed revenue for their planned projects”.

The auctions begin at what the consultancy said was a fairly modest initial level set by OCCTO, with 4GW up for grabs. However, that nationwide target capacity will be reassessed based on expected supply needs in the future, and the government Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) will determine the scale of future rounds, taking into account both auction results and trends in technology innovation.

Eligible resources are: renewable energy (solar PV, offshore and onshore wind), battery energy storage system (BESS), hydroelectric power, geothermal, nuclear and other low-carbon thermal power e.g., hydrogen, ammonia, biomass, LNG. Bids are expected to come from projects with a single source of power, with the exception of aggregated wind and solar, which can be included in combined bids.   

According to an official guidance document issued by OCCTO (in Japanese), energy storage resources including batteries and pumped hydro energy storage (PHES) will be limited to 1GW in the initial auction.

Meanwhile energy storage developers will be given a timeframe of four years from award of contracts to begin delivery, with other technologies given different expected schedules based on lead times, for example for solar PV, it is the last day of the fiscal year that falls five years after signing, unless changes in laws and ordinances make a start three years on feasible.   

‘Gradual growth’ for capacity market opportunity

With the target being at its modest starting level, significant capacity will be available for future auctions, and that could also have a bearing on what sort of technologies we see entering them, Shulman Advisory noted.

Therefore, “the market’s expansion will be gradual”, the consultancy said.  

The bid submission window will be open between 23 January and 30 January, with results expected to be announced three months after the window closes.

Writing in August 2023 on its corporate blog, legal firm White & Case said it anticipated the new capacity market to have a “significant impact” on the country’s battery storage market. BESS facilities must be standalone and not colocated with another power source.  

White & Case noted that participants must be either based domestically in Japan, or part of a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) consortium incorporating a domestic entity to which ownership will transfer within a year of bid award.

The award of contracts for 20-year fixed revenues would, White & Case said, “have significant impact on the financials and the business model of a BESS project in Japan”.

The capacity auctions – which Shulman Advisory pointed out are separate to and should not be confused with Japan’s capacity market unit auctions for existing resources of 1MW or more for single-year delivery periods – look set to provide another important revenue stream to the stack that can be earned in Japan’s energy market by BESS assets.

As has been widely covered by media including Energy-Storage.news, Japan’s battery storage market has been attracting investment over the past couple of years from domestic and international entities, albeit at a growth rate which might also be called ‘modest’ compared to some other national markets.

Battery assets are now allowed to trade energy in Japan’s wholesale markets and the first two projects to do so joined the Japan Electric Power Exchange (JEPX) spot market in mid-2023 through developer Pacifico Energy. Meanwhile, ancillary services opportunities are also opening up as the energy market’s deregulation begun in 2016 gathers pace and the Japanese grid’s patchwork of 10 separate regional operators are working to alleviate the curtailment of wind and solar renewables.  

In a recent Energy-Storage.news Premium interview, Franck Bernard, the energy storage head of developer Gurin Energy said that the Japanese BESS market is ready for scale-up, with the company planning to begin building a 500MW/2,000MWh project in the country in 2026.

Read more of Energy-Storage.news’ coverage of Japan.

Energy-Storage.news’ publisher Solar Media will host the 2nd Energy Storage Summit Asia, 9-10 July 2024 in Singapore. The event will help give clarity on this nascent, yet quickly growing market, bringing together a community of credible independent generators, policymakers, banks, funds, off-takers and technology providers. For more information, go to the website.

Continue reading

Bitech Executes LOA to Develop BESS, Solar Utility Power for Bridgelink

Credit: ESO

Bitech Technologies has signed a binding Letter of Agreement with Bridgelink Development toward a 5.8 GW pipeline of utility power, procurement of key resources and establishment of a joint venture with an undisclosed larger infrastructure group.

The initiatives between the companies are behind the advancing of BLD’s 3.8 GW of solar projects and 1.9 GW of BESS projects in the U.S. 

The companies plan to continue development of the projects by utilizing a Share Subscription Agreement being finalized for up to $250M, committed Letter of Intent for a late-stage BESS projects near Houston for up to $100M and securing the sale of the Incentive Tax Credits.

“The successful pre-negotiated financing, procurement, and joint venture with a larger infrastructure group represent significant milestones for Bridgelink as we contribute to this business combination with Bitech to continue to drive innovation and sustainability in the energy sector,” says Cole W. Johnson, chairman and CEO of Bridgelink.

“These strategic initiatives position us for continued success as we work diligently to bring our solar and energy storage projects to fruition. We are excited about the opportunities with Bitech that lie ahead and remain dedicated to our mission of advancing clean, renewable energy solutions.”

Continue reading

Syncarpha Capital Gets Permission to Operate Fifth Maine Community Solar Project

Syncarpha Capital has received permission to operate its 6.4 MW community solar array located in Wiscasset, Maine, offering subscribers a discount on energy credits generated by the array.

The project marks the company’s fifth community solar garden in Maine to receive permission to operate. To date, it has contributed a total of 30.8 MW to the Central Maine Power grid, with projects located in Wiscasset, Waldoboro, Readfield, Edgecomb and Riverside.

“Our success in Maine has been marked by perseverance through numerous set-backs in this emerging community solar market,” says Syncarpha Capital co-founder and CEO, Clifford Chapman.”Our team takes pride in our experience and innovative approach to address these unique challenges, as this Wiscasset project is a testament to our resolve. Syncarpha’s ability to consistently reach these milestones showcases our growing expertise and commitment to expanding sustainable, solar solutions across the state of Maine and beyond.”

Continue reading