The most important takeaway is that the NREL estimates that BESS costs will start to fall this year in its ‘low’ and ‘mid’ cost projections, with an increase over the next few years forecast in its ‘high’ scenario, visualised in the graph above.

This broadly matches up with recent analysis by BloombergNEF which found that BESS costs have fallen 2% in the last six months, as well as anecdotal evidence of reductions after spikes in 2022.

Compared to 2022, the national laboratory says the BESS costs will fall 47%, 32% and 16% by 2030 in its low, mid and high cost projections, respectively. By 2050, the costs could fall by 67%, 51% and 21% in the three projections, respectively.

These declines would result in costs of US$255/kWh, US$326/kWh, and US$403/kWh by 2030 and US$159/kWh, US$237/kWh, and US$380/kWh in 2050.

NREL cautioned that the 2022 cost starting point from which these figures are calculated is most likely on the higher end compared to the sources it analysed, which include BloombergNEF. It illustrated these in the graph below.

A big driver of the fall in BESS costs will be a decline in the costs of the battery cells and packs themselves, which can make up half the cost of a lithium-ion BESS. Research firm Fastmarkets recently forecast that average lithium-ion battery pack prices using lithium iron phosphate (LFP) cells will fall to US$100/kWh by 2025, with nickel manganese cobalt (NMC) hitting the same threshold in 2027.

NREL also highlighted that the energy and power components of a BESS have different long-term cost projections and so it is critical to cite duration when talking about project costs. On a US$/kWh, longer duration batteries have a lower capital cost while on a US$/kW basis shorter duration batteries come out cheaper. Both of these points are visualised in graphs below.